Skip to content
Campaign & Accountability

Still No Legal Update: When Will the Legal Steer Committee Update Its Supporters?

The infected blood community raised £22,003 through 409 pledges for specialist legal work. With the latest visible CrowdJustice update dated 5 July, supporters are reasonably asking what stage has been reached and when they will hear more.

By The Unheard Voice · Sep 9, 2026

By The Unheard Voice

The infected blood community responded when it was asked to support specialist legal work. People donated, shared the appeal and helped it exceed its original target.

The CrowdJustice appeal, Infected Blood Families Deserve Equal Justice, was funded on 29 May 2026. The public page records £22,003 from 409 pledges against a £22,000 stretch target.

The original appeal explained that approximately £15,000 was being sought for specialist legal advice, research and review of the infected blood compensation scheme and proposed legislation. It identified matters including disparities between living and deceased compensation, relationship-based awards, cut-off dates, severe psychological injury, care awards and the consultation process.

The page also made clear that obtaining a legal steer would not automatically lead to court proceedings. Advice might instead identify opportunities to engage with the Government or seek changes without formal litigation.

Those were important and clearly stated objectives. The question now being asked is straightforward: what stage has the work reached, and when will supporters receive a further public update?

What has already been disclosed?

The latest visible update on the CrowdJustice page is dated 5 July 2026. It introduced members of the committee and stated that legal advice had been received. It also explained that the substance of that advice remained protected by legal privilege and that the committee was committed to completing this stage of the process.

Legal privilege is important. Nobody should expect confidential advice, private correspondence or legal strategy to be published.

However, supporters may still reasonably ask for general information that does not disclose the contents of the advice. For example, they could be told whether the initial legal steer is complete, whether any further work has been commissioned, whether the committee has considered the advice and when another update is expected.

These are requests for a progress report, not demands to see privileged documents.

Questions supporters are asking

A useful public update could address:

• Whether the initial legal steer has been completed. • Whether the committee has formally considered it. • Whether further work is being undertaken by the instructed legal team. • Whether any engagement with the Government is planned. • Whether the money raised has been spent, committed or remains available for further legal work. • Whether the proposed community webinar or question-and-answer session will take place. • When supporters should expect the next update.

The CrowdJustice appeal states that funds are independently managed and paid directly towards legal costs. This article does not suggest that any committee member personally received donated money, nor does it allege wrongdoing or misuse of funds.

It simply asks what the community’s collective contribution has enabled and what happens next.

Why communication matters

Many donors are themselves bereaved, infected or affected by the infected blood scandal. Some contributed while facing illness, grief or financial pressure. Their support demonstrated trust in both the purpose of the fundraiser and those guiding it.

Committee members are volunteers and may be undertaking complicated work alongside their own personal responsibilities. That deserves recognition. Legal processes can also take time, and a delay does not itself establish that anything improper has occurred.

Even so, a short factual progress report would reduce uncertainty and help supporters understand the current position. If there is a reason why more information cannot yet be shared, that too could be explained without revealing privileged advice.

On 27 August, The Unheard Voice asked whether the legal steer had been commissioned, what stage had been reached and when supporters would receive a meaningful update. The public CrowdJustice page currently continues to show 5 July as its latest update.

The request remains simple: please tell supporters what stage the work has reached and when they can expect to hear more.

Right of reply

The Unheard Voice welcomes a factual response from the Legal Steer Committee. If an update has been published elsewhere, if any detail in this article is inaccurate or if further context can be provided, we will review it and correct the public record where necessary.

This is not a personal allegation against any individual. It is a request for clear communication about a publicly funded legal initiative that hundreds of people supported in good faith.

Sources: https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/infected-blood-families-deserve-justice/ https://theunheardvoice.uk/stories/the-community-met-its-deadline-where-is-the-legal-update-mtbfaeyy

— The Unheard Voice