Skip to content
People & Lived Experience

He Was Their Dad Before He Was Ever a Patient

A father who spent decades undergoing dialysis, operations, blood transfusions and two failed kidney transplants was later diagnosed with hepatitis C acquired through NHS treatment. His family know the infection came through his medical care — but years later, missing records mean they may never know which specific procedure caused it.

By The Unheard Voice · Sep 18, 2026

By The Unheard Voice

He was in his twenties when kidney disease changed the course of his life. From then on, survival meant hospitals, dialysis, operations, transplants and repeated medical treatment. His daughter has shared his story with The Unheard Voice. At her request, we are keeping his name anonymous.

From 1981 through 1991 and beyond, he underwent multiple operations and periods of inpatient dialysis. Dialysis was not an occasional appointment; it became part of the rhythm of his life. When he was admitted to hospital for surgery or other treatment, the dialysis still had to continue, sometimes in hospital renal units away from his usual treatment setting.

During the 1980s, he also underwent two kidney transplants. Both failed. He received blood transfusions as part of his medical treatment and continued to require extensive NHS care as his health became increasingly complex.

Then, in the 1990s, he was diagnosed with hepatitis C.

For his family, there is no uncertainty about the broader source of that infection. His daughter has confirmation that his hepatitis C was acquired through NHS treatment. What remains unknown is something far more specific: which part of that treatment infected him?

Was it connected to one of his blood transfusions? Was it associated with one of his operations? Could transplantation have been the route? Or did transmission happen during the years he spent receiving dialysis?

His surviving records do not provide that answer.

That is what makes his story so difficult. He spent more than a decade undergoing repeated NHS procedures and treatment, yet decades later the evidence needed to identify the precise exposure is incomplete. There were several medically recognised potential routes, but there is a difference between knowing that an infection was acquired through NHS treatment and knowing the individual procedure responsible.

His family know the first.

They may never know the second.

It is easy to reduce a life like his to medical terminology: chronic kidney disease, dialysis, operations, transplants, blood transfusions, hepatitis C.

But those words do not describe what it meant to live through it.

He was a young man whose kidneys failed. He had to build his life around dialysis simply to stay alive. He underwent major operations. He endured two kidney transplants and the devastating reality of both failing. Each hospital admission brought more treatment, more intervention and more uncertainty.

Through all of it, he kept going.

His daughter remembers a father whose life became inseparable from hospitals. That is what makes the question surrounding his hepatitis C so painful.

Somewhere within the treatment that was keeping him alive, another serious illness entered his life.

When he was diagnosed with hepatitis C in the 1990s, his family understood that the infection had resulted from NHS treatment. What they did not receive was a clear answer identifying precisely where it had happened.

His daughter remembers very little happening after the diagnosis. There was no treatment journey the family can now point back to and no clear explanation of which procedure had caused the infection.

Treatment for hepatitis C at the time was very different from the highly effective medicines available today, and her father was already seriously unwell. Without complete surviving records, his family cannot now reconstruct every clinical decision that followed.

He died in 2000.

With his death, the person best able to describe what doctors had told him was gone too. Much of the medical documentation surrounding his hepatitis C and the years of treatment before it no longer appears to survive.

His daughter is now left trying to piece together a history that once existed in full.

The possibility of blood-borne virus transmission in dialysis and renal healthcare settings is historically recognised. Blood transfusion and organ transplantation are also recognised routes through which hepatitis C could historically have been transmitted.

That matters because all of those things formed part of this man’s medical history.

But none of that allows us to say which particular exposure infected him.

The story is not that his infection came from nowhere. His family have confirmation that it resulted from NHS treatment. The unresolved part is exactly where, within years of treatment, it occurred.

That distinction matters because this was not one isolated procedure followed immediately by a diagnosis.

This was a man who spent years moving between dialysis, surgery, transplantation and hospital care. From 1981 through 1991 and beyond, the number of potential medical exposures accumulated.

Then came hepatitis C.

Decades later, his family are still left asking which treatment caused it.

There is also a danger when medical records disappear. The gaps in the paperwork can begin to dominate the story. We start talking about what cannot be proven, what cannot be located and what cannot be reconstructed.

But the missing paperwork should never become more important than the person.

He existed.

He underwent the treatment.

He lived through the operations.

He endured years of dialysis.

He received two kidney transplants.

He was diagnosed with hepatitis C acquired through NHS treatment.

And he died in 2000.

Those facts do not disappear because the exact exposure can no longer be identified.

His daughter has shared his story because she believes people with histories like her father’s deserve to be seen.

Patients dependent upon dialysis could spend years inside the healthcare system. Some underwent repeated surgery. Some received transfusions. Some received organ transplants. Some moved between different hospitals and dialysis units.

If they were subsequently diagnosed with hepatitis C, identifying one individual exposure years later could be extraordinarily difficult.

That does not mean their stories should become invisible.

It means those histories need to be examined properly.

How many other renal patients lived through similar treatment histories? How many were infected through NHS care but were never able to identify the precise procedure responsible? How many died before their families fully understood what had happened?

And how many relatives are now left trying to reconstruct events from decades ago using medical records that are incomplete or no longer exist?

For this family, those questions are deeply personal.

Their father was not simply a dialysis patient, a transplant patient or somebody who contracted hepatitis C.

He was their dad.

A man who spent much of his adult life fighting to survive serious kidney disease. A man who endured years of treatment intended to keep him alive. And somewhere within that treatment, he was infected with hepatitis C.

His family know where the infection came from.

They simply do not know which specific NHS procedure caused it.

He should not disappear into a statistic, and his story should not disappear with his medical records.

The Unheard Voice would like to hear from other patients and families whose experiences involve dialysis, kidney treatment, transplantation, blood transfusion and hepatitis or another blood-borne infection. If this happened to you or someone you love, we would like to hear your story. Submissions can be made anonymously.

— The Unheard Voice